Code generation — which AI model writes the best code?
Coding workloads have specific demands: long contexts (whole repos), stable tool-use loops for agents, low hallucination on API signatures, and enough output tokens to return entire files. Reasoning modes help with multi-step refactors but are too slow for inline completion.
Is this your use case?
- ·You're building a coding agent (Cursor Composer, Claude Code, autonomous PR generation).
- ·You need refactoring across multiple files, not just snippets.
- ·Output needs to be whole files, not 50 lines.
- ·You want tool calls (read file, run tests) reliable every turn.
What to look for
- →At least 128k context — 200k+ preferred for repo reading.
- →At least 16k output tokens so full files come back.
- →Stable tool calling with low argument hallucination.
- →Recent knowledge cutoff (2025+) for current framework APIs.
Recommended models
Best-of list, ordered by fit — not alphabetically.
- 1anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6Top pickAnthropic's workhorse: top-tier coding and agentic, fair pricing.
Top SWE-bench score (77.2%), 64k output tokens, extremely stable tool loops. The default for coding agents.
Model details - 2anthropic/claude-opus-4.6Anthropic's premium tier for the hardest reasoning and coding tasks.
Even better on the hardest tasks (SWE-bench 79.4%) but pricier. Reach for it on critical migrations or security audits.
Model details - 3openai/gpt-5.4OpenAI's new flagship — agentic workloads and deep reasoning chains.
400k context for monorepos, very strong tool use. Pricier per token than Sonnet but newer knowledge cutoff.
Model details - 4openai/gpt-5.4-miniBest budgetGPT-5.4's smaller sibling — cheaper, faster, built for volume.
Inline completion and linter hints — fraction of the cost, same 400k context. Not for deep refactoring.
Model details - 5deepseek/deepseek-v3DeepSeek-V3 — MoE model, impressive coding quality for very little money.
The dark horse: cheapest serious-quality coder. Compliance concerns for US/EU enterprise.
Model details